The Supreme Court has never held that the Miranda warnings are required simply because a person is in custody or simply because a person not in custody is interrogated.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: The precedent case for analyzing confession issues
Q17: It is not unconstitutional to obtain a
Q18: At issue in Dickerson v. United States
Q19: The Miranda warnings must be given:
A) immediately
Q20: The U.S. Supreme Court held that confessions
Q22: Pennsylvania v. Muniz (1990) established that if
Q23: Some major differences between a grand jury
Q24: Under this power, the government can bring
Q25: Unless an individual has been formally granted
Q26: At any time during questioning, the defendant
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents