Which of the following best describes the significance of Groh v. Ramirez (2004) ?
A) It illustrates the importance of paying attention to the details of the warrant before searching.
B) It explains the significance of constitutional issues regarding vehicle searches.
C) It illustrates the legality of law enforcement officers handcuffing citizens during searches of their vehicles or homes.
D) It explains the need for a warrant when conducting wire taps on telephones in both private and public areas.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Searches with a warrant are:
A) presumed to
Q11: When conducting an inventory search of a
Q12: Relationships in which third-party consent to search
Q13: Which of the following best describes the
Q14: Which of the following is not a
Q16: General searches are:
A) routinely conducted by police.
B)
Q17: All searches must be:
A) with a warrant.
B)
Q18: Routine searches at our national borders require:
A)
Q19: When a person is handcuffed after being
Q20: Which of the following is not one
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents