Write a fictional argumentative dialogue between two characters who disagree about the basic nature of reality. The two characters can defend any metaphysical viewpoint, including ones developed in Chapter 4. However, any option ought to be defended or criticized with arguments. Aside from the option you are arguing for and against, your dialogue should address five other philosophers, and/or frameworks discussed in the chapter. You can use these as a resource for arguments or simply as a means of clarifying your viewpoint. The dialogue can end with agreement, with agreeing to disagree, or with arriving at a new viewpoint that synthesizes their starting standpoints. You may also stage the dialogue as an oral presentation before your class, or make a video of it.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q55: Give one argument for idealism.
Q56: Charles Hartshorne responds to the idea that
Q57: Why is it impossible to draw a
Q58: When Kant argues that the world is
Q59: According to Immanuel Kant, we live in
Q60: In a teleological view of the world,
Q62: Remembering that metaphysics is evaluative, answer question
Q63: What is a teleological metaphysics? How
Q64: Describe the metaphysical views of Descartes, Spinoza,
Q65: Describe the metaphysical viewpoint of idealism. Focus
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents