In the Lesher v.Strid case, the court held that:
A) a representation is material if it is likely to influence a reasonable person.
B) for a misrepresentation to be actionable, it must be one of fact rather than of opinion.
C) a mutual mistake of fact renders a contract voidable by the adversely affected party if the mistake is so fundamental that it frustrates the purpose of the contract.
D) the contract's "as is" clause expressly excluded reliance on extrinsic representations such as the defendant's representation about the four-acre water rights.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that a mutual mistake of fact can render a contract voidable if it fundamentally frustrates the contract's purpose.

In the Lesher V