In Robinson v. Durham , the court found:
A) the Robinsons were good faith purchasers for value when they bought the car for their business, and they had good title which they passed to Durham.
B) the Robinsons had a voidable title, and they passed good title to Durham, who was a good faith purchaser for value.
C) there was a breach of warranty of title between the Robinsons and Durham.
D) the Robinsons obtained no title from the thief, but they passed good title to Durham since he was a good faith purchaser for value.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: The buyer and seller of goods may
Q9: The Code has expanded the rights of
Q30: The Heinrich v. Titus-Will Sales, Inc. case
Q31: The bulk sales portion (Article 6) of
Q32: A void title may allow good title
Q36: The risk of loss for "sale or
Q37: Amanda ordered fifty personalized sweatshirts from King
Q38: The 2001 Revised UCC Article 1 defines
Q39: A voidable title is no title.
Q40: A "buyer in the ordinary course of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents