The court in the Schoenberger v. Chicago Transit Authority case held that:
A) the actual authority of an agent may be founded on the acts or words of the agent.
B) implied authority is such authority as the principal knowingly permits the agent to assume.
C) actual authority is such authority as a reasonable, prudent person, exercising diligence and discretion, in view of the principal's conduct, would naturally suppose the agent to possess.
D) ZuChristian had neither actual nor apparent authority to make an offer of a specific salary or to make a promise of additional compensation.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court found that ZuChristian, the agent in question, did not have either actual or apparent authority to make specific salary offers or promises of additional compensation, emphasizing the limitations on the agent's power to bind the principal in such matters.

The Court in the Schoenberger V