The 1933 Securities Act defines the term "security." The Supreme Court of the United States has adopted a two-tier analysis of what constitutes a security. Within this analysis the Court has used a three-part test to determine whether a non-traditional financial transaction constitutes an investment contract and thus a security. Explain
(a) the 1933 Act's statutory definition of security,
(b) the courts' general interpretation of the 1933 Act's definition and
(c) the Supreme Court's two-tier test. Use case law to illustrate your explanation, if appropriate. Also, why do you think the Supreme Court had to devise such an analysis?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q77: For purposes of Section 16(b) of the
Q78: A solicitation of proxies from holders of
Q79: SEC regulations concerning fraud in securities transactions
Q80: Marge wishes to raise some money to
Q81: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act:
A) allows the SEC to
Q83: Section 14(e) of the Securities Act of
Q84: The use of the Internet or other
Q85: The Reform Act's safe harbor under the
Q86: Dryler Corporation sold unregistered securities that were
Q87: Registration under the 1933 Act calls for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents