What does the 1928 Olmstead v. United States case make evident when examining the history of e-discovery?
A) the law can be applied retroactively
B) technology is frequently ahead of the law
C) wiretapping has always required a warrant
D) entrapment is a useful tool in law enforcement

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The 1928 Olmstead v. United States case dealt with wiretapping and the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The case established that wiretapping did not violate the Fourth Amendment because it did not involve a physical search or seizure of property. However, this decision was made before the advent of modern electronic communication and the proliferation of data storage, which has led to extensive debate and legal battles over the extent of privacy rights in the digital age. Examining the history of e-discovery makes evident that technology is frequently ahead of the law, and legal frameworks must adapt to new technological advances.

What Does the 1928 Olmstead V