Differing opinions between key advisors
A) can be beneficial because it forces a more thorough examination of reasons and alternatives.
B) rarely occur.
C) usually leads to security dilemmas.
D) All of these are true.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Differing opinions between key advisors can be beneficial because it forces a more thorough examination of reasons and alternatives, which ultimately can lead to better decision making. Option B is incorrect as differing opinions happen quite often, especially in high-stakes decision making. Option C is incorrect as security dilemmas may arise from other factors and are not solely related to differing opinions among advisors.

Differing Opinions Between Key Advisors