Rich is a doctor.One day while strolling in the park he sees Adam, a stranger, choking on an apple.Rich does nothing to help Adam.Adam sues Rich for negligently failing to help him.
A) Rich had a duty to help Adam, because as a doctor it would have been easy for Rich to do so.
B) Rich did not have a duty to help Adam, because of the emergency that Adam faced.
C) Rich had a duty to help Adam because of the Tarasoff decision on doctors.
D) Rich did not have a duty to help Adam because there was no special relationship between Rich and Adam.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Those who engage in gratuitous undertakings do
Q12: Palsgraf is a famous case that helped
Q13: MATCHING
-someone not in the zone of danger
A)duty
B)foreseeable
Q14: Nonfeasance can never be the basis of
Q16: MATCHING
-the area within which it is foreseeable
Q16: The Andrews test is broader than the
Q17: MATCHING
-someone in the zone of danger
A)duty
B)foreseeable plaintiff
C)unforeseeable
Q18: Vince falls down the stairs in his
Q19: MATCHING
-something of value that is exchanged between
Q20: The Ace Pesticide Company (APC) is hired
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents