Lena is water skiing.When the boat is about to pull her out of the water, the propeller of the boat injures her.She sues the boat owner for negligence.
A) The reason res ipsa loquitur does not apply is that the injury was caused by an unavoidable accident.
B) The reason res ipsa loquitur does not apply is that the propeller was in the exclusive control of the boat.
C) The reason res ipsa loquitur applies is that an accident of this kind was more likely than not due to someone's carelessness.
D) The reason res ipsa loquitur does not apply is that it is as likely that Lena was careless as it is that the boat was careless.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: Legislative intent may help you determine whether
Q18: Res ipsa loquitur can be used only
Q19: If the violation of a statute is
Q20: An employer is vicariously liable for the
Q21: Dave operates a small guitar shop where
Q23: MATCHING
-the owner of the car is liable
Q24: With liability insurance
A)The insurer agrees to cover
Q25: A/an _ is a promise by a
Q26: Someone who has assets with which to
Q27: Medical malpractice
A)is the failure of a doctor
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents