Matching
Match the following
Premises:
few or no assets
Responses:
actual cause
intervening cause
thin-skull rule
standard of proof
judgment proof
highly extraordinary
superseding cause
duty to mitigate damages
preexisting condition
proximate cause
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
actual cause
intervening cause
thin-skull rule
standard of proof
judgment proof
highly extraordinary
superseding cause
duty to mitigate damages
preexisting condition
proximate cause
Premises:
actual cause
intervening cause
thin-skull rule
standard of proof
judgment proof
highly extraordinary
superseding cause
duty to mitigate damages
preexisting condition
proximate cause
Responses:
Related Questions
Q1: Intervening forces are always superseding causes.
Q3: The two components of proximate cause are
A)
Q4: The two tests for actual cause are
A)
Q5: You can always determine actual cause through
Q10: An intervening cause
A)is always a superseding cause
B)determines
Q11: Match the following
Q12: A plaintiff with a high vulnerability to
Q13: While the but-for test and the substantial-factor
Q14: The manner in which the injury occurs
Q20: Under the mitigation-of-damages rule, the defendant will
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents