The reason that primary assumption of the risk is a complete defense (and not a basis for comparative fault) is that the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily accepted a particular risk that the defendant did not have a duty to protect the plaintiff against.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Primary assumption of risk applies when the plaintiff has voluntarily accepted a risk that is inherent to an activity, thereby absolving the defendant of a duty to protect the plaintiff from those risks. This legal doctrine recognizes that certain risks are so integral to some activities that the duty of care is effectively negated, making it a complete defense against liability rather than a matter for comparative fault analysis.

The Reason That Primary Assumption of the Risk Is a Complete