When the key facts of the court opinion and the key facts of the client's case are not similar, if substitution of the key facts would not result in changing the outcome of the case, the court opinion can be used as precedent.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

If the key facts of the court opinion and the client's case are not similar, then the court opinion may still be used as precedent if substituting the key facts would not change the outcome of the case. This means that the legal reasoning and principles used by the court in its opinion could still be applicable to the client's case, even if the specific factual circumstances are different.

When the Key Facts of the Court Opinion and the Key