Z Co. filed suit against W, Inc. in 2009 seeking damages for patent infringement. At December 31, 2009, legal counsel for Z believed that it was probable that Z would be successful against W for an estimated amount in the range of $30 million to $60 million, with each amount in that range considered equally likely. Z was awarded $40 million in April 2010. Z should report this award in its 2009 financial statements, issued in March, 2010 as
A) A receivable and unearned revenue of $40 million.
B) A receivable and revenue of $40 million.
C) A disclosure of a gain contingency of $40 million.
D) A disclosure of a gain contingency of an undetermined amount in the range of $30 million to $60 million.SFAS #5 states that gain contingencies should not be recognized in the financial statements until realized.Adequate disclosure should be made in the footnotes but care should be taken to avoid misleading implications as to the likelihood of realization of the contingent gain.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q69: Orange Co. can estimate the amount of
Q74: Accounting for costs of incentive programs for
Q76: When a gain contingency is probable and
Q77: The main difference between accounting for rebate
Q79: Which of the following is a contingency
Q80: Providing a monetary rebate program for purchasing
Q81: Grossman Products began operations in 2009. The
Q82: During the year, L&M Leather Goods sold
Q83: A $90,000, 6-month, noninterest-bearing note is discounted
Q88: Volt Electronics sells equipment that includes a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents