Determine whether the following statement is true or false: Although most-favored-nation (MFN) clauses in contracts between health plans and healthcare providers are not per se illegal, they should be reviewed under the rule of reason analysis for antitrust purposes.
A) True, because the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ruled that MFN clauses are not per se illegal and the FTC encourages health plans to include them in provider contracts.
B) True, because although MFN clauses are not per se illegal, they violate antitrust laws if they have a predatory purpose and an anticompetitive effect.
C) False, because MFN clauses involve decisions by providers concerning the level of fees to charge, and thus they are per se illegal.
D) False, because MFN clauses are not per se illegal, and thus they are exempt from antitrust laws and regulation by the FTC.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q53: The board of directors of the Garnet
Q54: The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
Q55: In examining accountability in the current managed
Q56: Regulators of health plans have set standards
Q57: The following situations illustrate per se violations
Q59: State X issued a nonresident license to
Q60: n the paragraph below, a statement contains
Q61: In developing its corporate strategies, the Haven
Q62: The Department of Health and Human Services
Q63: Several states have adopted clinical practice guidelines
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents