While conducting a payroll audit, an internal auditor in a large government organization found inadequate segregation in the duties assigned to the assistant director of personnel. When the auditor explained the risk of fraud, the assistant director became upset, terminated the interview, and threatened to sue the organization for defamation of character if the audit engagement was not curtailed. The auditor discussed the situation with the chief audit executive (CAE) . The CAE should then:
A) Curtail the audit engagement to avoid potential legal action.
B) Provide a report to senior management recommending a fraud investigation.
C) Continue the original engagement program as planned but include a comment about the assistant director's reaction in the engagement final communication.
D) Add additional testing to determine whether other indicators of fraud exist.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q115: A post-audit questionnaire sent to audit clients
Q116: What is the primary factor that determines
Q117: As part of an operational audit, an
Q118: An audit of an organization's claims department
Q119: Which of the following would not be
Q121: After completing a fraud investigation but before
Q122: Which of the following potential performance measures
Q123: Which of the following is not relevant
Q124: After issuance of the engagement final communication
Q125: In response to an accounts receivable confirmation,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents