Which of the following is an example of something that CAN be done with hierarchical policing (CFHP) but CANNOT be done with standalone policers?
A) Limiting the maximum forwarding rate of each individual policer and, at the same time, marking, packets as in-profile or out-of-profile.
B) Putting packets in a buffer as they are received, and marking packets as in-profile or out-of-profile as they are removed from the buffer.
C) Rate-limiting the collective output of several policers, and to reallocate bandwidth that is not utilized by some policers to other policers that need to use it.
D) Rate-limiting the collective output of several policers towards each egress FFPC, while maintaining control of the maximum overall forwarding rate.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q166: Q167: Forwarding sub-classes are configured in the context Q168: What type of unwanted packet drops can Q169: Which of the following statements about the Q170: Which of the following about scheduling is Q172: Which of the following is NOT a Q173: Which priority-mode queue parameter may influence both Q174: Which of the following QoS functions does Q175: Which of the following fields in packets Q176: If two queues complete for bandwidth in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents