Labuk is a 20-year employee of Whirley Corporation.During his career with Whirley,Labuk has felt uncomfortable with his supervisor,Bob,because of his behavior.On one occasion,Bob told him that foreigners should stop seeking jobs in the United States if they cannot perform.On another occasion,Bob yelled at Labuk and called him an "idiot." Which of the following may be true in this case?
A) Labuk has a harassment claim based on national origin under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because he belongs to a protected racial class.
B) Labuk does not have a harassment claim based on national origin because these two incidents, although offensive, do not create a hostile work environment.
C) Labuk has a harassment claim based on national origin because Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides protection against discrimination based on country of citizenship.
D) Labuk does not have a harassment claim based on national origin because the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) allows employers to discriminate in favor of U.S. citizens.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q29: Ken is a paying resident at the
Q30: The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA)prohibits:
A)
Q31: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
Q32: Abdel applies for a job as a
Q33: According to Garcia v.Spun Steak Co.,a facially
Q35: An employer considering an "English-only" job requirement
Q36: Which of the following is a difference
Q37: Hassan,an undocumented worker employed by Robco Warehouse,is
Q38: If an employer enforces an English-only policy
Q39: Dalip,an Asian male,is fired after being late
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents