The Reapportionment Act of 1929 capped House membership at 435 members. Should we allow for more members in the House? If so, should we return to the standard suggested by the founders (i.e., 30,000 constituents per member)?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is The Reapportionment Act of 1929 set the current cap on House membership at 435 members, a number that has not changed since then. As the population of the United States has grown significantly since 1929, many argue that it may be time to reconsider this cap and allow for more members in the House.

Returning to the standard suggested by the founders, which was approximately 30,000 constituents per member, could be a viable option. This would mean significantly increasing the number of House members to better represent the growing population of the country. With more members, each representative would have a smaller constituency, allowing for more personalized representation and potentially better responsiveness to the needs and concerns of their constituents.

However, increasing the number of House members would also come with its own set of challenges, including the logistics of accommodating a larger legislative body and the potential for increased partisanship and gridlock. It would also require significant changes to the current structure and operations of the House.

Ultimately, the decision to allow for more members in the House and potentially return to the founders' standard of representation would require careful consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks, as well as a thorough examination of the practical implications and feasibility of such a change. It is a complex issue that would need to be thoroughly debated and analyzed before any decision is made.

The Reapportionment Act of 1929 Capped House Membership at 435