Evidence of prior crimes is usually admissible.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Evidence of prior crimes is generally not admissible in court to prove a defendant's character in order to show action in conformity therewith. It is often considered prejudicial and can unfairly influence a jury. However, it may be admissible for other purposes, such as proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, depending on the rules of evidence governing the jurisdiction.

Evidence of Prior Crimes Is Usually Admissible