In the case of Mueller and Kirkpatrick (1999), there were several reasons why courts typically frown on hearsay evidence. Which one of the following is not a reason?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Courts typically frown on hearsay evidence due to its unreliability stemming from factors like misperception, misunderstanding, and faulty memory, which all contribute to the risk of uncertainty. Narrative clarity, however, is not a reason for the disfavor; in fact, clear narrative might be seen as beneficial in court but is not related to the concerns over hearsay evidence.

In the Case of Mueller and Kirkpatrick (1999), There Were