Which of the following was a direct effect of the Three-Fifths Compromise?
A) Slaveholding states had significantly more representation in the House than they would have if slaves were not counted.
B) Small states had significantly more representation in the House than they would have if slaves were not counted.
C) All non-White individuals in the United States were counted as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes.
D) None of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: The Great Compromise included provisions for a
Q38: The key factor that led to success
Q39: If slaveholding states considered slaves property, not
Q40: Who did not want slaves to be
Q41: Which compromise resolved the issue of how
Q43: Which group was in favor of the
Q44: For the Constitution to become the basis
Q45: Which of the following was not an
Q46: Why were the Anti-Federalists opposed to the
Q47: Which was the first state to ratify
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents