Which of the following is a criticism of the molecular clock as a dating technique?
A) The proportion of carbon14 in the atmosphere may change from one period of prehistory to another.
B) Contamination by sources of uranium other than water may affect the accuracy of the dating method.
C) Its accuracy depends on the accuracy of other chronometric methods used to date the fossil ancestors of one of the species being compared.
D) The molecular clock is unreliable because it dates rocks, NOT organic remains.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q63: Paleomagnetism is valuable because it is the
Q64: The molecular clock is based on the
Q65: Sometimes old rocks are affected by other
Q66: What role was played by fossils of
Q67: Cleaning routines such as ultrafiltration and acid-base-wet
Q68: Which dating method provides dates between 40,000
Q70: Describe the difference between relative dating methods
Q71: Explain the concepts of stratigraphic superposition and
Q72: Compare and contrast the isotopic methods of
Q73: Analyze the usefulness of climatic data to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents