James Rachels argues that there is no morally significant difference between killing and letting die.

Name: James Rachels argues that there is no morally significant difference between killing and letting die.
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.9 (46 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

James Rachels argues that there is no morally significant difference between killing and letting die, suggesting that the moral status of both actions should be evaluated based on their outcomes rather than the distinction between acts and omissions.

James Rachels Argues That There Is No Morally Significant Difference