The Following Questions For Readings: "The Non-Identity Problem and Genetic Harms-The Case of Wrongful Handicaps," Dan W. Brock
-According to Brock, claiming that a seriously impaired child would be better off if the impairment were prevented is

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Brock argues that claiming a seriously impaired child would be better off if the impairment were prevented is incoherent because it involves comparing the existence of one individual with a different potential individual who would have existed without the impairment.

The Following Questions for Readings: "The Non-Identity Problem and Genetic