Even though a work of art like Donald Judd's Untitled (figure 2.29) was intended to have no meaning, function, or illusion, why might we still consider it to have meaning?
A) The context might change
B) We may see it as original
C) We perceive things in our own way because of who we are
D) Both the artist and viewer need to communicate
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: When we define art aesthetically, we:
A) Imagine
Q3: One of the ways we evaluate works
Q4: The works of art accepted by the
Q5: How might an artist demonstrate his or
Q6: If someone makes a work of art,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents