In his essay, John Corvino discusses the importance of assessing something's merits and faults in an informed way. That's why his essay contains a number of personal anecdotes. In your essay, explain Corvino's defense of first-person accounts in some ethical debates. Then respond to the following, "Are there any cases where first-person accounts would make it harder to make an ethical assessment?" If so, offer an example and explain the risk. If not, explain why first-person accounts are always important.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is -Recreate and explain Corvino's position in favor of offering first-person accounts in the context of the homosexuality debate.
-Either argue that there are at least some moral arguments where first-person accounts are unnecessary for coming to a conclusion on the subject, explaining at least one example.
-Or, argue that there aren't any moral arguments where it's unimportant to learn from first-person accounts when making a moral assessment.

In His Essay, John Corvino Discusses the Importance of Assessing