Eaton offers a consequentialist argument against inegalitarian pornography. Is her consequentialist case a strong one? Can you think of compelling non-consequentialist reasons to oppose inegalitarian pornography? Which approach to the issue do you find most promising and why?

Question

Eaton offers a consequentialist argument against inegalitarian pornography. Is her consequentialist case a strong one? Can you think of compelling non-consequentialist reasons to oppose inegalitarian pornography? Which approach to the issue do you find most promising and why?

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is -Demonstrate understanding of Eaton's consequentialist argument, as well as the difference between consequentialist and non-consequentialist reasons.
-Demonstrate the ability to weigh kinds of moral reasons against one another.

Eaton Offers a Consequentialist Argument Against Inegalitarian Pornography