For example, there may be greater risks associated with adults carrying weapons in high schools and preschools. If those risks can be mitigated with well-targeted regulations instead of outright bans, these are to be preferred, given how vulnerable forced blanket disarmament makes those locations when it comes to threats like school shootings. The general idea here is that if we are going to regulate some practice, then less onerous regulations should be preferred to more onerous ones, all things being equal.
This particular view is pretty controversial. In your essay, explain whether or not Hsiao and Blanchette's position on concealed carry in preschools and high schools is the only way to think about this topic if you are a pro-concealed carry advocate. Then, explain your take on the question of whether or not adults should be able to carry guns at school. If they should be able to, who should be able to (teachers, staff, visiting parents, etc.)? If they shouldn't be able to, why not?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is -Discuss whether or not Hsiao and Blanchette's position on concealed carry at schools is a necessary is a necessary outgrowth of being a pro-concealed carry advocate.
-Argue that adults should be able to carry concealed weapons at schools, explaining which adults should have this ability.
-Or, argue that adults should not be able to carry concealed weapons at schools, explaining why.

For Example, There May Be Greater Risks Associated with Adults