Which ONE of the following cases is an authority for the principle that a defendant who commits an offence while suffering a hypoglycaemic attack may plead automatism?

Name: Which ONE of the following cases is an authority for the principle that a defendant who commits an offence while suffering a hypoglycaemic attack may plead automatism?
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.9 (64 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Quick and Paddison (1973) is the case that established that a hypoglycaemic attack, caused by an external factor such as insulin, can lead to a plea of automatism.

Which ONE of the Following Cases Is an Authority for the Principle