The fact that not all of Braham and van Hees's three conditions can be satisfied simultaneously does not mean it is impossible to coherently allocate moral responsibility for collective outcomes because we
A) can accept fragmentations in responsibility allocations.
B) can still make an assignment of responsibility after making a theoretical choice.
C) could deny that at least one individual is responsible for every state of affairs.
D) All of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement suggests that despite the impossibility of satisfying all three conditions simultaneously, coherent allocation of moral responsibility for collective outcomes is still possible through various means: accepting fragmentation in responsibility allocations, making theoretical choices to assign responsibility, and denying that at least one individual is responsible for every state of affairs.

The Fact That Not All of Braham and Van Hees's