Cases Subsequent to AG V

Cases subsequent to AG v. Blake (2000) have clarified some points. Which of the following is false?

A) The justification of the remedy given in AG v. Blake is to protect claimants from inadequate contract remedies.
B) The remedy of account of profits is 'gain-based' in that it is aimed at stripping the contract-breaker of the profits made from his breach.
C) The remedy of account of profits is merely an extreme of the Wrotham Park remedy, which awards the claimant the sum he would have negotiated to release the defendant from his contractual obligation (loss of bargain damages) .
D) The remedy may be less than a full account of profits. It must take account of all the circumstances in assessing the claimant's loss of bargain.