Which of the following represents the Majewski rule in intoxication?
A) A drunken intent is still an intent.
B) Voluntary intoxication may provide a partial defence to a crime of specific intent where s/he lacked the necessary intent but no defence at all to a crime of basic intent.
C) D will have a partial defence to crimes of specific intent provided he was drunkenly incapable of forming it.
D) If charged with a crime of specific intent, D will have to establish a reasonable doubt that he acted recklessly.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The most significant distinction between insanity and
Q2: What is the correct definition of 'mind'
Q3: In which of the following would D
Q4: Which of the following would be a
Q5: Which of the following would be the
Q6: To which of the following would self-induced
Q8: The ratio of Kingston [1994] is as
Q9: D is charged with murder and claims
Q10: The age of criminal responsibility in England
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents