John K. Davis | Conscientious Refusal and a Doctor's Right to Quit
Davis argues that doctors have a right to conscientious refusal to treat a patient as long as they do not make the patient worse off than he or she would have been had they not gone to the doctor in the first place. This refusal is justified by the restitution approach, which further settles a number of moral controversies that can arise from an "ethics of quitting."
-If the odds are high that a patient would have found another doctor willing to perform a procedure, then it is relevant to consider
A) moral counseling.
B) inconsistent referral.
C) majority limitation.
D) availability of other doctors.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q39: John K. Davis | Conscientious Refusal and
Q40: John K. Davis | Conscientious Refusal and
Q41: John K. Davis | Conscientious Refusal and
Q42: John K. Davis | Conscientious Refusal and
Q43: John K. Davis | Conscientious Refusal and
Q45: John K. Davis | Conscientious Refusal and
Q46: John K. Davis | Conscientious Refusal and
Q47: Davis argues for the restitution approach to
Q48: Davis argues that a doctor's reasons for
Q49: Monroe H. Freedman | Solicitation of Clients:
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents