Alan Donagan | Justifying Legal Practice in the Adversary System: A Look at Confidentiality
Donagan looks at arguments justifying lawyer-client confidentiality within the adversary system. While the standard interpretation of confidentiality is justified within the adversary system, an extended interpretation allowing attorneys to withhold information they would otherwise disclose as a moral duty, does not. Donagan examines two arguments for an extended version of confidentiality and demonstrates that the first fails as a consequentialist argument and the second on the basis of false premises. He argues for the sufficient nature of the standard interpretation of confidentiality.
-In the Lake Pleasant case, one of the lawyers ___________ information about a prior crime of the defendant's.
A) distorted
B) came forward with
C) withheld
D) fabricated
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q32: Kenneth Kipnis | A Defense of Unqualified
Q33: Kenneth Kipnis | A Defense of Unqualified
Q34: Kenneth Kipnis | A Defense of Unqualified
Q35: Kipnis says on the one hand that
Q36: Accordingly to Kipnis, there is no justification
Q38: Alan Donagan | Justifying Legal Practice in
Q39: Alan Donagan | Justifying Legal Practice in
Q40: Alan Donagan | Justifying Legal Practice in
Q41: Alan Donagan | Justifying Legal Practice in
Q42: Alan Donagan | Justifying Legal Practice in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents