Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention, CCTV, and the Life of Mrs. Aremac
Ryberg looks at the question of whether CCTV violates, or is even relevant to, people's rights to privacy. He compares the use of CCTV to a "Mrs. Aremac," who sits observing the street from an upper window, and examines several arguments based on being unknowingly observed, on observational motive, and on collection of information. His conclusion is that if Mrs. Aremac does not violate anyone's rights, then neither does CCTV.
-According to Ryberg, there is no difference between ___________ one is being watched and not knowing one is being watched.
A) knowing
B) not thinking
C) suspecting
D) not caring if
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q61: Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention,
Q62: Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention,
Q63: Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention,
Q64: Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention,
Q65: Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention,
Q67: Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention,
Q68: Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention,
Q69: Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention,
Q70: Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention,
Q71: Ryberg states that the motive behind observation
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents