Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention, CCTV, and the Life of Mrs. Aremac
Ryberg looks at the question of whether CCTV violates, or is even relevant to, people's rights to privacy. He compares the use of CCTV to a "Mrs. Aremac," who sits observing the street from an upper window, and examines several arguments based on being unknowingly observed, on observational motive, and on collection of information. His conclusion is that if Mrs. Aremac does not violate anyone's rights, then neither does CCTV.
-According to Ryberg, if the motive for observation is the reduction of crime, then people's rights to privacy are

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Ryberg argues that if the motive for observation, such as crime reduction, is similar to a benign observer like Mrs. Aremac, then people's rights to privacy are not violated by CCTV.