Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention, CCTV, and the Life of Mrs. Aremac
Ryberg looks at the question of whether CCTV violates, or is even relevant to, people's rights to privacy. He compares the use of CCTV to a "Mrs. Aremac," who sits observing the street from an upper window, and examines several arguments based on being unknowingly observed, on observational motive, and on collection of information. His conclusion is that if Mrs. Aremac does not violate anyone's rights, then neither does CCTV.
-Ryberg states that the argument from amount of information fails because

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Ryberg argues that the argument from the amount of information fails because there is no clear way to determine when the amount of information collected becomes excessive or violates privacy rights.