Jesper Ryberg | Privacy Rights, Crime Prevention, CCTV, and the Life of Mrs. Aremac
Ryberg looks at the question of whether CCTV violates, or is even relevant to, people's rights to privacy. He compares the use of CCTV to a "Mrs. Aremac," who sits observing the street from an upper window, and examines several arguments based on being unknowingly observed, on observational motive, and on collection of information. His conclusion is that if Mrs. Aremac does not violate anyone's rights, then neither does CCTV.
-According to Ryberg, while CCTV could be relevant to other moral problems, it is

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Ryberg argues that CCTV is not relevant to privacy rights if Mrs. Aremac, who observes the street, does not violate privacy rights.