Thomas Nagel | Ruthlessness in Public Life
Nagel discusses the effects of public roles on personal morality and determines that a depersonalization of, or moral insularity from, one's behavior can occur when people act as agents of a larger institution. He presents the theory of obligation as a way to understand this moral peculiarity, analyzes personal and public morality of outcomes and morality of actions, concluding that personal moral restraints can guide public life even with its more impersonal and impartial goals.
-Holding public office can shield people from their personal morality such that what they do in their official capacity is
A) depersonalized.
B) responsible.
C) irresponsible.
D) morally restrained.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q93: Sissela Bok | Defining Secrecy-Some Crucial Distinctions
Bok
Q94: Sissela Bok | Defining Secrecy-Some Crucial Distinctions
Bok
Q95: Bok distinguishes secrecy from privacy, yet notes
Q96: Why does Bok state that in the
Q97: Thomas Nagel | Ruthlessness in Public Life
Nagel
Q99: Thomas Nagel | Ruthlessness in Public Life
Nagel
Q100: Thomas Nagel | Ruthlessness in Public Life
Nagel
Q101: Thomas Nagel | Ruthlessness in Public Life
Nagel
Q102: Thomas Nagel | Ruthlessness in Public Life
Nagel
Q103: Thomas Nagel | Ruthlessness in Public Life
Nagel
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents