Rachels argues that killing someone is not necessarily morally worse than letting that person die.

Name: Rachels argues that killing someone is not necessarily morally worse than letting that person die.
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.9 (44 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

James Rachels argues that there is no moral difference between killing someone and letting someone die, suggesting that the morality of both actions should be judged based on their outcomes and intentions rather than on a distinction between acts and omissions.

Rachels Argues That Killing Someone Is Not Necessarily Morally Worse