Warren argues that some things may have inherent value but not rights, such as trees.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Warren's argument is based on the distinction between inherent value and rights, suggesting that entities like trees may possess value in themselves without necessarily having rights. This perspective allows for the recognition of the importance of non-human entities while still differentiating between the types of moral considerations they warrant.

Warren Argues That Some Things May Have Inherent Value but Not