Steinbock argues that our treatment of other beings should be guided by moral recognition of the desires and interests of which such beings are capable. This seems very similar to Peter Singer's principle of equal consideration of interests. Are Steinbock and Singer relying upon the same moral principle to arrive at different conclusions about the relative moral statuses of humans and animals? If so, are they right? If not, whose position is more persuasive? Explain.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Steinbock argues that our treatment of other beings should be guided by moral recognition of the desires and interests of which such beings are capable. This seems very similar to Peter Singer's principle of equal consideration of interests. Are Steinbock and Singer relying upon the same moral principle to arrive at different conclusions about the relative moral statuses of humans and animals? If so, are they right? If not, whose position is more persuasive? Explain.

Steinbock Argues That Our Treatment of Other Beings Should Be