Timmerman thinks that his Drowning Children case shows that Unlucky Lisa is
A) morally permitted to enjoy some good less important than a child's life at least one time in her own life.
B) morally prohibited from enjoying some good less important than a child's life at least one time in her life.
C) permitted to enjoy non-moral goods such as personal hobbies or luxuries, not by morality, but by self-interest.
D) justified in taking a break from morality every once and a while.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Timmerman's Drowning Children case illustrates that individuals are morally permitted to sometimes prioritize their own less significant goods over more critical needs of others, like saving a child's life, acknowledging a balance between moral obligations and personal well-being.

Timmerman Thinks That His Drowning Children Case Shows That Unlucky