Driver rejects moral subjectivism partly on the grounds that it cannot explain how genuine moral disagreement is possible.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Driver argues against moral subjectivism by pointing out that if moral judgments are merely expressions of personal preferences or attitudes, then what appear to be moral disagreements would not be genuine disagreements about facts in the world, but rather differences in personal taste or sentiment. This perspective challenges the possibility of true moral disputes under moral subjectivism, as it suggests that there are no objective moral truths over which to disagree.

Driver Rejects Moral Subjectivism Partly on the Grounds That It