In her reply, Gillian Brock says:
Partiality clearly has some important role to play in our moral lives. However, just as partiality towards (say) family members or friends may be justified in some cases and not others, partiality towards co-nationals will be similarly circumscribed.
In your essay, give an example of a case where partiality would be morally justified in a person's life. Why would it be justified? Does this justification of acceptable interpersonal partiality extend to international relationships? In other words, can you identify a case where the reason why it's morally okay to be partial interpersonally is also a sufficient reason to be partial internationally? How does your case relate to the wider debate that Brock and Daniel Bonevac are having?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In his essay, Daniel Bonevac covers four
Q3: Daniel Bonevac and Gillian Brock agree that
Q4: In his essay, Bonevac argues for what
Q5: In his essay, Bonevac claims that Kantianism
Q6: In his essay, Bonevac argues that which
Q7: In her essay, Brock argues that states
Q8: Which of the following is NOT one
Q9: Brock is concerned with balancing which two
Q10: Which author makes the claim: "The current
Q11: Which of the authors expresses serious concern
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents