Saba Fatima is worried about government-instituted thought policing. In her section on that topic, she claims:
government-backed inquiry into ideological beliefs is a dangerous precedent to follow, especially when it comes to communities that are already stigmatized and vulnerable … Once a tool for surveilling people's ideologies is put in place, its parameters can evolve to suit the needs of the state and what it deems as threatening. The primary purpose of a state apparatus then becomes to preserve itself rather than to serve the people.
Do you think that it's a problem for the primary purpose of some state apparatus to be state self-preservation rather than service of state citizens? Or, do you think that there are cases where it's justified for a tool's purpose to be state self-preservation? Defend your answer, linking it to the wider question of instituting religious tests.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In his essay, I. G. raises an
Q3: In her reply, Saba Fatima is clearly
Q4: In his essay, I. G. claims that
Q5: In his essay, I. G. raises a
Q6: In his essay, I. G. suggests that
Q7: In her essay, Fatima argues that religious
Q8: In her essay, Fatima likens barring entry
Q9: In her essay, Fatima affirms that we
Q10: Both authors agree with which the following
Q11: In his reply, I. G. argues that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents