In Footnote Three of Nathan Nobis's Essay, Nobis Responds to the Concern

In footnote three of Nathan Nobis's essay, Nobis responds to the concern that men should not offer arguments on the abortion debate. He says:
Someone's sex (or gender) doesn't influence their ability to give good arguments on issues that, in many ways, mostly affect people who are importantly different from them. Women can have insights and good arguments about issues that uniquely affect men, and vice-versa. … Women are not infallible on these topics, and neither are men. The goal for everyone is to carefully and critically evaluate any claims and arguments, whatever and whoever their source.
In your essay, consider the question, "What influences a person's ability to give good arguments on a certain issue?" To do this, try to come up with an example from beyond the abortion debate that responds to the line of reasoning that Nobis presents here. In other words, can you think of a case where people might think that only those uniquely affected by an issue are able to craft good arguments about it? Why should others agree? Does this example complicate Nobis' position on men's ability to give arguments in the abortion debate, or are the cases dissimilar enough that his point stands?