The Supreme Court in Goldman v. United States (1942) involving the use of detectaphone by law enforcement officers held that there was no search because
A) The officers did not physically intrude on the defendant's office when they placed the wiretap with electronic devices.
B) The officers did not physically intrude on the defendant's office when they held the detectaphone against the defendant's office walls while they were in the adjoining vacant office.
C) The defendants did not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of their conversations.
D) The defendants did not have any objective expectation of privacy in areas outside their office.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The Supreme Court in Olmstead v. United
Q3: What are the two elements of the
Q4: What did the Court rule in Kyllo
Q5: Which of the following cases used the
Q6: Which of the following cases used the
Q7: Which areas and objects are protected by
Q8: Which of the following statements is true?
A)
Q9: A person has no reasonable expectation of
Q10: Which of the following surveillance technology devices
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents